We use cookies to ensure you have the best browsing experience on our website. Please read our cookie policy for more information about how we use cookies.
The way the "disjoint pair" condition was phrased was, to me, very confusing.
As they explained it; "in order for a beautiful pair to be considered disjoint, its indices cannot appear in any other beautiful pairs". This, to me, meant that any indices with multiple value matches would be excluded from the final set.
What they MEANT was "each i and j index can only be used once in the result set".
Maybe if they used fewer mathematical expressions and actually spelled out what they were looking for from us.
Beautiful Pairs
You are viewing a single comment's thread. Return to all comments →
The way the "disjoint pair" condition was phrased was, to me, very confusing.
As they explained it; "in order for a beautiful pair to be considered disjoint, its indices cannot appear in any other beautiful pairs". This, to me, meant that any indices with multiple value matches would be excluded from the final set.
What they MEANT was "each i and j index can only be used once in the result set".
Maybe if they used fewer mathematical expressions and actually spelled out what they were looking for from us.