We use cookies to ensure you have the best browsing experience on our website. Please read our cookie policy for more information about how we use cookies.
Considering perfromance, "To use WHERE:" would be more resource consuming than the other two. Nevertheless it is a solution :). My favorite is "For more lazy:"
Cookie support is required to access HackerRank
Seems like cookies are disabled on this browser, please enable them to open this website
Top Earners
You are viewing a single comment's thread. Return to all comments →
Considering perfromance, "To use WHERE:" would be more resource consuming than the other two. Nevertheless it is a solution :). My favorite is "For more lazy:"