We use cookies to ensure you have the best browsing experience on our website. Please read our cookie policy for more information about how we use cookies.
Because if it's more than k, is that really considered k-consecutive? I would not have initially counted any of those, however the solution clearly considers 33, 34 and 35 in this case.
Cookie support is required to access HackerRank
Seems like cookies are disabled on this browser, please enable them to open this website
Project Euler #47: Distinct primes factors
You are viewing a single comment's thread. Return to all comments →
Because if it's more than k, is that really considered k-consecutive? I would not have initially counted any of those, however the solution clearly considers 33, 34 and 35 in this case.