We use cookies to ensure you have the best browsing experience on our website. Please read our cookie policy for more information about how we use cookies.
Using loops without brackets when it using only 1 line is totally readable. If you push too much in one line, its not ok. Guys shoud have used ternary operator for real 1 line here. There is basically 2 lines
Agree, I think its much better readability if we use curly brackets only if a loop or if() statement has more than 2 lines. I hate when people use brakets liket this thou:
Day 19: Interfaces
You are viewing a single comment's thread. Return to all comments →
I like this one, it's clean and easy to follow.
Also, since it's a one liner
for loop, you should be able to getaway with removing the curley braces.I mean, since we're shortening code...
Then you start losing readability. But does look interesting. Just one of those things C# has that Java doesn't.
i have got only so:
@rtmrdnk I'm getting correct result by your code but not by below code in Java8, can you tell why?
for(int i=1;i<=n;sum+=(n%i++==0?i:0));
I cracked up at work. You won the internet today.
You could, but not considered a good programming practice from the point of view of readability and avoiding strange bugs
Using loops without brackets when it using only 1 line is totally readable. If you push too much in one line, its not ok. Guys shoud have used ternary operator for real 1 line here. There is basically 2 lines
This should be like this for 100% readability.
Agree, I think its much better readability if we use curly brackets only if a loop or if() statement has more than 2 lines. I hate when people use brakets liket this thou:
Better readable like this:
we need to check till halfway only (n/2).