We use cookies to ensure you have the best browsing experience on our website. Please read our cookie policy for more information about how we use cookies.
According to the PHP documentation of array_slice third argument denotes the length of the slice.
array array_slice ( array $array , int $offset [, int $length = NULL [, bool $preserve_keys = FALSE ]] )
If I do not pass third argument then it will be NULL by default. As a result the slice will be created until the end of the array. I believe there is nothing to do with the volume of the array. Moreover, without passing the third argument like I denoted in my previous comment I am having all the test cases passed.
Arrays: Left Rotation
You are viewing a single comment's thread. Return to all comments →
Hi,
For cases including shifts more than the array size this should work.
It is not necessary. By the hypothesis of the task shifts cant bo more than array size
Yeah, Thanks for the response. I missed that hypothesis.
In that case this shouldn't this be just fine?
array_merge(array_slice($a, $k), array_slice($a, 0, $k));In this test, for "Tester 8", you need to use third argument for array_slice. Otherwise, an error is returned.
This is because for "Tester 8" uses a large array of transmitted values
According to the PHP documentation of
array_slicethird argument denotes the length of the slice.array array_slice ( array $array , int $offset [, int $length = NULL [, bool $preserve_keys = FALSE ]] )If I do not pass third argument then it will be
NULLby default. As a result the slice will be created until the end of the array. I believe there is nothing to do with the volume of the array. Moreover, without passing the third argument like I denoted in my previous comment I am having all the test cases passed.It's very strange. But, yesterday, when I tested, it didnt work.
Yes, you are right! It have to be like you write!