We use cookies to ensure you have the best browsing experience on our website. Please read our cookie policy for more information about how we use cookies.
Couldn't you add "|| fast.next != slow" to the while loop condition for a more optimal solution? That way it wouldn't have to loop around for a third time if by chance fast skips over the the slow node on the second loop.
Cookie support is required to access HackerRank
Seems like cookies are disabled on this browser, please enable them to open this website
Linked Lists: Detect a Cycle
You are viewing a single comment's thread. Return to all comments →
Couldn't you add "|| fast.next != slow" to the while loop condition for a more optimal solution? That way it wouldn't have to loop around for a third time if by chance fast skips over the the slow node on the second loop.