We use cookies to ensure you have the best browsing experience on our website. Please read our cookie policy for more information about how we use cookies.
My #48 was 1700, but the problem is the same. 1800 too. 1900 too. But 2100 is a leap year, and the expected output was 13th...
It seems the test writer swapped the tow calendar usage period...
Cookie support is required to access HackerRank
Seems like cookies are disabled on this browser, please enable them to open this website
Day of the Programmer
You are viewing a single comment's thread. Return to all comments →
My #48 was 1700, but the problem is the same. 1800 too. 1900 too. But 2100 is a leap year, and the expected output was 13th... It seems the test writer swapped the tow calendar usage period...