We use cookies to ensure you have the best browsing experience on our website. Please read our cookie policy for more information about how we use cookies.
Loading...
  1. Practice
  2. Functional Programming
  3. Introduction
  4. Functions or Not?
  5. Discussions

Functions or Not?

  • knusprigekroete + 1 comment

    Thank you! Is there some good Haskell IO Tutorial? I struggle with reading from stdin and writing to stdout and spend much more time than necessary reading stackoverflow and hoogle just to write a million of ugly recursive functions to do it.

    • Fiorix + 1 comment

      use this as pattern for IO:

      main :: IO ()
main = do
    n_temp <- getLine
    let n = read n_temp :: Int
    forM_ [1..n] $ \boh  -> do
        q_temp <- getLine
        let q = read q_temp :: Int
        rawInput <- getMultipleLines q
        let input = [(read (words str !! 0) :: Int, read (words str !! 1) :: Int ) | str <- rawInput]
        -- here starts your code


getMultipleLines :: Int -> IO [String]
getMultipleLines n
    | n <= 0 = return []
    | otherwise = do          
        x <- getLine         
        xs <- getMultipleLines (n-1)    
        let ret = (x:xs)    
        return ret

      It works with most input format of HackerRank:

      • First read and parse an integer (n_temp and n)
      • For n times read another number from input called q and read the next q lines with getMultipleLines. It returns a list of q lines as strings.
      • To parse the numbers inside a single line, use list comprehension to iterate on the lines and the function "words" to split the values. This code works if every line contains exactly two integers and put them in a list of type [(Int, Int)]
      • ProofOfPizza + 1 comment

        Thx! This is helpful. All this IO stuff was getting pretty ugly :)

        • wirefox + 2 comments

          That's still ugly, IMO. Here's my runner:

          readInt x = read x :: Int
main = putStr . unlines . run . (map readInt) . words =<< getContents

          From run, you can just work with pure functions like the Haskell gods intended.

          • matthias_a + 1 comment

            how do you know how many lines to read? In a situation where a user is inputting a variable set of inputs, would this work?

            If you run this it will just ask for inputs forever.

            also, I think that you don't need to define your own read if your run function has a definition run :: [Int] -> [String]

            • wirefox + 1 comment

              HackerRank tells you all you need to know about the input, so it's a completely different situation from an arbitrary CLI. This approach works for the type of problems on this particular site, and for the typical use case where input comes from a terminating program or a file.

              It actually won't run forever because of a handy thing called EOF.

              Nice idea about the type sig, though.

              • matthias_a + 1 comment

                how would you write 

                ms <- forM [1..n] $ const $ getLine
let d = M.fromList $ (\[x,y] -> (x,y)) . words <$> ms

                on one line?

                • wirefox + 0 comments
                  d <- M.fromList <$> map ((\[x,y] -> (x,y)) . words) <$> replicateM n getLine
          • M_F_H + 0 comments

            I'm a Haskell newbie and reading input data is the most difficult part of the problem for me. I don't see where your code structures the input data into the "grouping" required in this task.

            I mean, how is the function "run" (if I understood at least that part) supposed to get T, and then, for 1..T, the value of N and the list of (x,y) as required for this problem? (I understand that we could simply "skip" the initial T but then (until EOF is reached) definitely need to get the N in order to know how many lines (x,y) we must read -- where am I wrong?)

            I'm keen to switch from imperative to functional programming, but as far as the "I/O" is concerned, the problem statement "there are T test cases and for each test case..." already contains the declarative "for". And I'd like to write a function that receives a vector of N pairs (x,y), but how to get there without doing "for i in 1..N: read [x, y] and append to the list L" ?