We use cookies to ensure you have the best browsing experience on our website. Please read our cookie policy for more information about how we use cookies.
you can achieve this by using group by too but then it produces multiple rows. so can't we use 'in' instead of '=' after where to detect these multiple rows
Cookie support is required to access HackerRank
Seems like cookies are disabled on this browser, please enable them to open this website
Ollivander's Inventory
You are viewing a single comment's thread. Return to all comments →
you can achieve this by using group by too but then it produces multiple rows. so can't we use 'in' instead of '=' after where to detect these multiple rows