devasood seriously, show main function as uneditable.. its tough to debug with "wrong answer" and "right answer"
ravi1008Asked to answer Could you just share your code so that I can examine it and help you out.
Even I suffer a lot while coding in hackerrank due to "uneditable" part like main() function. But you can always print the intermediate results to cross check the code flow and approach.
ankeet_s Node Insert(Node head,int data) { Node tmp = new Node(); tmp.data = data; tmp.next = null;
if(head == null) { head = tmp; return head; } Node current = head; while(current.next != null) { current = current.next; } current.next = tmp; return head;}
navkhan how does this work? there is no link between the 2ndlast item (formerly the last) and the new one just added. Also current.next, when current is null woud return an NPE, wouldnt it?
robbyoconnor [deleted]navkhan I am not asking for a solution, I had already submitted a working one. So yes to answer your unnecessarily rude question, I do have an understanding of how linked lists work. But I do like to see others' solutions as well, and if better than mine, I like to improve. I noticed, he used current.next, which is the correct way to do it. I dont think questions are frowned upon here nor is there
robbyoconnor calm down.
robbyoconnor Also when you submit a correct working solution, you can see everyone elses in on the leaderboard.
ray10mathew Never in the history of calming down has someone calmed down by being told to calm down.
francisjohn61981 lol
cu_16bcs2416 YOU WERE JUST ADDING FUEL TO THE FIRE. GROW UP!
sameeraktz dont
snehalparab83 perfect
etayluz [deleted]robbyoconnor Why did you post this?
pratibha_vrawat Please dont post solution here. :/
manishku99251 why he is helping out us!!!!!!! you can't say that "stop posting solutions here"
abhishekjoshi261 apse ho gaya toh apna code post kar do
Maalbash you shouldn't post a solution here. also you should probably add newNode->next = NULL. incase you wanna be able to add elements to it later
Bonniesaur [deleted]
jdionne86 Thank you for posting the solution. I'm new to linked lists but this clarified what I was supposed to be doing and now its much more clear. Understanding is better than aimless frustration.
samfelder17 I tried doing mine recursively in C any idea what went wrong?
Node* Insert(Node *head,int data) { if(head->next==NULL) { Node *newn=(Node *)malloc(sizeof(Node)); head->next=newn; newn->next=NULL; newn->data=data; return newn; } Insert(head->next,data); return head; }
bsiddarth29 According to the problem statement... 1.)You need to figure out a way if head=NULL i.e if the list is empty but when you declare "if(head->next==NULL)" it means that you are consider only the non empty case. 2.)Even in this above case you are just returning "newn" nut you need to return thr address of first node which is "head"!
try adding if(head==NULL) block of statements also
pandeysatyendra1 ya bro u r right this is needed in this code....
vishal_gupta1_c1 You are making changes in head only, which is wrong. Take any other pointer & copy head into it & then proceed,rest your code seems absolutely fine.
kalpitshah0078 you have not covered the condition where the head is null. if you want to do this in this manner , your code should be somthing like this:
Node* Insert(Node *head,int data) { if(head==NULL) { Node *newn=(Node *)malloc(sizeof(Node));
newn->next=NULL; newn->data=data; head=newn; } else{ Node *newn2=(Node *)malloc(sizeof(Node)); newn2=head; while(newn2->next!=NULL){ newn2=newn2->next; } newn2->next=Insert(newn2->next , data); } return head;}
saikiranhs thanks! nice one! you can reduce complexity by removing while loop there, because anyway in recursion head moves as you pass
newn2->next, so no need to check the condition whether it is pointing to the extremethanhhienm3 Thanks ! your solution is good for me. I can undertant .
kunasinduja1998 can someone explain me the else condition;)
avik_dutta111191 Only problem with recursive one is how to return the start pointer of the list ...(i tried it tooo)
pandeysatyendra1 actually you are not using concept if head is already null then what will print.......
pradeesh1998 try in c++
typedef struct Node *list; list Insert(list head,int data) { if(head==NULL){ head = new Node; head->next=NULL; head->data=data; return head; } return Insert(head->next,data); }
dvd2000 In C++ the typedef is implicit so you don't need it
ankurw07 Wrong Answer! Some possible errors: 1. You returned a NULL value from the function. 2. There is a problem with your logic
avik_dutta111191 No way to return the start pointer
abhishekjoshi261 bhai code post kar de yaar
neldarov something is wrong with you simple logic :)
lobheshdhakarma1 how am i getting error???plz explainNode* Insert(Node *head,int data { Node n = (node)malloc(sizeof(node)); n->data=data; n->next=NULL; if(head==NULL) { return head=n; } else { Node *rhead = head; while(head->next!=NULL) { head=head->next; } head->next =n; return rhead; } }
levin2_0 It doesn't seem to accept recursive answers that are working in g++
soulthani first, check if the head is null (means that its start with emapty list) then the first if condition will handle that
second, mantain head object by assigning its references to current then iterate over the current while current.next still containing Node, when it found current.next == null, means that current is the last Node, then it assign the new Node to Current.next and return the head
with this way, we makesure that current would never be found as null
AnuragPatil Please suggest , unable to find out mistake in this :
Node* Insert(Node *head,int data) { Node *temp; temp->data = data; temp->next = NULL; if(head == NULL) { head = temp; } else { Node *p; p = head; while(p->next != NULL) p = p->next; p->next = temp; } return(head); }Showing no response in output :(
rajinder0852 you do not assign the address to pointer temp Node* Insert(Node *head,int data) { Node *temp; temp=new Node(); //That's the statement missing temp->data = data; temp->next = NULL;
if(head == NULL) { head = temp; } else { Node *p; p = head; while(p->next != NULL) p = p->next; p->next = temp; } return(head); }
prannavk1 p->next=temp; //in cpp , giving a segmentation fault
why is the above code giving me segmentation fault
desnesn When you exit the while loop you have a pointer pointing to nowhere. It didn't matter on the Print exercise, but here it does.
In your else statement, create another Node* pointer variable (*tail, for instance), and make it receive your *p at each iteration.
At the last iteration, it will be pointing to the last Node structure, which will be the tail of the linked list. Then your
p->next=temp;will work :-) !
varuos_oohas Node* Insert(Node *head,int data) { Node *temp=new Node(); temp->data = data; temp->next = NULL; if(head == NULL) { head = temp; } else { Node *p; p = head; while(p->next != NULL) p = p->next; p->next = temp; } return(head); }
prannavk1 p->next=temp; //in cpp , giving a segmentation fault
why is the above code giving me segmentation fault
KuboK pointer temp needs to have assigned an adress
Node *temp=new Node();
Sahilamin219 try making p->next=temp statement out side of the while loop . it should not affect the result anyway.
chattyhack nice code
abbhishek971 This is my solution in C++14
Node* Insert(Node *head,int data) { Node *temp = new Node(); temp->data = data; temp->next = NULL; if(head==NULL) { head = temp; } else if(head->next==NULL) { head->next = temp; return head; } else { Insert(head->next,data); } return head; }
arkaguin thanks
neeraj1515_kaus1 what is the difference bet Node* temp and Node *temp.?
abbhishek971 Apologies for the delay in reply.
There's no difference. Both the notations result in the same identifier declaration.
raghuvendra867 bro can u explain ur code?
abhishekjoshi261 solution.cc:46:1: error: ‘Node’ does not name a type; did you mean ‘modf’? Node* Insert(Node head,int data) ^~~~ modf solution.cc: In function ‘int main()’: solution.cc:83:41: error: ‘insertNodeAtTail’ was not declared in this scope SinglyLinkedListNode llist_head = insertNodeAtTail(llist->head, llist_item);
showing this error code not workingshubhvratj SinglyLinkedListNode* insertNodeAtTail(SinglyLinkedListNode* head, int data) {
SinglyLinkedListNode *new_node,*ptr; new_node = new SinglyLinkedListNode(); new_node->data = data; new_node->next = NULL; if(head == NULL){ head = new_node; return head; }else{ ptr = head; while(ptr != NULL){ ptr = ptr->next; } ptr->next = new_node; new_node->next = NULL; return head; }}
can you please help me with this code?
abhishekjoshi261 Node* Insert(Node *head,int data) { struct Node *temp,*tail,*ptr; temp=new Node; temp->data=data; temp->next=NULL; if(head==NULL) { head=temp;} else { ptr=head; while(ptr!=NULL) { tail=ptr; ptr=ptr->next; } tail->next=temp; } return head;
}
bro i think you missed the struct function and above is the soln that worked for me pm me if you find any problem
asmitaverma [deleted]asmitaverma Here's my solution in C++14. The class definition of SinglyLinkedListNode specifies that the constructor has an argument which is the data part of the node to be inserted.
SinglyLinkedListNode* insertNodeAtTail(SinglyLinkedListNode* head, int num){
SinglyLinkedListNode* node = new SinglyLinkedListNode(num); node->data = num; node->next = NULL; if(head == NULL){ head = node; } else{ SinglyLinkedListNode* temp; temp = head; while(temp->next != NULL){ temp = temp->next; } temp->next = node; } return head;}
anamalaii Thank you
alexey_chekhovi1 SinglyLinkedListNode* node = new SinglyLinkedListNode(num);
Works.
SinglyLinkedListNode *newNode = new SinglyLinkedListNode();
solution.cc:61:62: error: no matching function for call to ‘SinglyLinkedListNode::SinglyLinkedListNode()
So we do not have an empty constructor, but do have a constructor with parameters. The one who wrote the background of this task should be immediately exterminated.
akkidewangan96 new_node = new SinglyLinkedListNode(data);
try this in 2nd line
sanket_sonje99 [deleted]sanket_sonje99 SinglyLinkedListNode *new_node = new SinglyLinkedListNode(data); new_node->data = data; new_node->next = NULL;
SinglyLinkedListNode *ptr; if(head == NULL) { head = new_node; return head; } else { ptr = head; while(ptr->next != NULL) { ptr = ptr->next; } ptr->next = new_node; new_node->next = NULL; return head; }
akkuarora07 how can i remove this error?
solution.cc:47:1: error: ‘Node’ does not name a type; did you mean ‘modf’?
please help.
ashish21ghosh I don't think you need to check if head->next==NULL, rather in the else block you can add
head->next = Insert(head->next,data);
satish_ucer Node *temp=new Node(); is not working in my code. can you explain it?
jackie88812 you need memory space before temp->data = data;
It's my suggestion below: Node *temp = (Node *)malloc(sizeof(Node)); temp->data = data; temp->NULL;
Vneel the statement p->next=temp; needs to be out of the while loop. You assign after you traverse the whole list, not at every node.
kartikaythakkar Node* Insert(Node *head,int data) { Node *temp=new Node(); temp->data=data; temp->next=NULL; if(head==NULL){ head=temp; } else{ Node *p; p=head; while(p->next !=NULL){ p=p->next; } p->next=temp; } return head; }
arkaguin thanks
gkartik640 same as mine. did u resolve it.
praveen_dakshan1 in your while loop , it should not be there(p->next=temp).
dark_c_03 you have to create new node and allocate memory to it by malloc or new in c++
vnaykanswal55 Do dynamic memory allocation C++ Node* temp=new Node(); C Node* temp= (Node*)malloc(sizeof(Node));
aashah7 In your code:
if(head == null) { head = tmp; return head; }Why not simply return
tmpinstead of re-assigningheadtotmpand then returninghead?Just curious. Thanks!
jdionne86 You could definitely just return tmp, and in fact would be more efficient. I just did it this way for my own understanding of making it clear what my intention was. The intention being: if the list is empty, assign our new node (tmp) to the head.
rahulkumardubey thanku it helped a lot ...
k_pradeep Below approach is with recursion
Node Insert(Node head,int data) { return insertDS(head, data, head); } Node insertDS(Node head, int data, Node parent){ if(head == null){ head = new Node(); head.data = data; if(parent != null) parent.next = head; }else insertDS(head.next, data, head); return head; }
prem_hackerrank @k_pradeep
What is the significance of this line: if(parent != null) parent.next = head;
vijay_laxmi3 this doesn't work
arkaguin it's not working
cse1519210260 var newNode = new SinglyLinkedListNode(data); if(head == null){ head = newNode; return head; }else{ var temp = head; while(temp.next!=null){ temp = temp.next; } temp.next = newNode; return head }
cse1519210260 Hope this will helps you !! :)
- var newNode = new SinglyLinkedListNode(data);
- if(head == null){
- head = newNode;
- return head;
- }else{
- var temp = head;
- while(temp.next!=null){
- temp = temp.next;
- }
- temp.next = newNode;
- return head
- }*
agarwal_shivam23 i am not getting Node insert() method .we have just created the class node and now we are creating node insert method .can you help out.
akhilsharma_as82 how come u are returning head everytime, it shud be return current; head will only be returned in if condition
devasood I dont mind it being uneditable, show me the uneditable code so i can program accordingly.
jjenner689 I have a recursive solution in Python if anyone is interested:
def Insert(head, data): if head == None: return Node(data, None) else: if head.next == None: head.next = Node(data,None) else: Insert(head.next,data) return headfcorvese Thank you! In the 'else' case, I was returning the 'Insert' result and I see why that is incorrect now.
SirLemuel In the 3rd line you return a new Node object. I thought we were supposed to return only the head object. Can you explain this part? My understanding with linked list is that the head never has any data but is used to reference the first element in the list, yet you return a single Node with data and no head.
xiangyu_li1990 I can explain. The third line return the newest Node as the inserted node to the linked list because the program has already checked the head is Null. Returning the newest node would be the answer
siddharth9200 Nice use of the floating recursive call.
priya12345 nice code
SuperGogeta I did it non recursively, calling a function multiple times unless necessary would be inefficient.
def Insert(head, data): if head == None: return Node(data,None) temp = head while temp != None: prevFinalNode=temp temp = temp.next prevFinalNode.next = Node(data,None) return head
Also you could have used elif instead of else>if/else as such
def Insert(head, data): if head == None: return Node(data, None) elif head.next == None: head.next = Node(data,None) else: Insert(head.next,data) return head
The code looks more readable this way I think, sorry for the nitpicking.
DanHaggard I think you can trim one line out of your non-recursive solution:
def Insert(head, data): if head == None: return Node(data, None) curr_node = head while curr_node.next != None: curr_node = curr_node.next curr_node.next = Node(data, None) return head
psykosh My code is basically the same other than naming and using "is/is not" for testing if None...
and it's failing.
def Insert(head, data): if head is None: return Node(data) here = head while here.next is not None: here = here.next here.next = Node(data) return head
thedurphy If we are nitpicking, setting the second argument in Node to None shouldn't be necessary since the default is already set to None.
petitjhn could you kindly explain line 4 and 5
desaim Nice! Good to see how to solve this problem in different ways.
subhsamal But Would you please clear one doubt! How is head able to use next attribute? Node class object only can have it, right ?
ritikagupta8734 why u returned head ? in last line u can return head.next ?
pratik9044536615 Node *temp = new Node(); temp->data=data; temp->next=NULL; if(head==NULL) { head=temp; } else { Node *current=head; while(current->next!=NULL) { current=current->next; } current->next=temp; } return head;
kris21592 Hey,
If we go in the else part, we should return current instead of head right?
How does returning head give us the correct solution? Can you please explain?
samikshya_chand1 my program is the same as yours except the first part of the code where mine says
Node *temp; //did not use Node*temp=new Node temp->data=data; temp->next=NULL;
This is causing error in my code.. Can you please explain?
gurudashimself This is becase when you used Node *temp, you just made a pointer of type Node, No memory was allocated as in the pratik9044536615's code where he uses
new Node();
So, I would suggest allocating memory either using new Node() or go all C style and use
Node *temp = (Node *)malloc(sizeof(Node));
mallireddy_t `cpp Node* Insert(Node *head,int data) { Node *temp,*prev; temp->data=data; temp->next=NULL; prev=head; if(prev==NULL) head=temp; while((prev->next)!=NULL) prev=prev->next;
prev->next=temp;return head;
} could you tell me the error
prabhat_prabhat2 [deleted]
flappyS To the person who wrote this test. For the love of god. Show the main function.
arvindd25 Totally agree. This is frustrating.
hjalmar_basile I came to know about Harsha Suryanarayana and his sad story only yesterday, and today by pure chance I started solving this subdomain and found out that he's the creator of these list challenges, he was working with a friend on the MyCodeSchool start-up.
It seems that many people here are unaware of who he was, these are a few links:
Rest in peace Harsha, you were a good soul.
robbyoconnor holy shit yes
mr_pental22 tip:in c or c++ use only pointers
techniker One way is to copy the code to your IDE & debug there
niranjan_wad I second that. I tried my logic in eclipse and works fine according to my main method. I am not able to understand what seems wrong to them here??
NickFi I usually post solutions in C#. And for all problems that are non-trivial (for my level), I copy the solution in SharpDevelop and then I do my coding and debugging. Once the solution seems to work, I copy and paste the code back on hackerrank. For C/C++ or C#, Visual Studio Community Edition is also a good alternative.
anser7ali my code is
def insertNodeAtTail(head, data): if head: node = SinglyLinkedListNode(data) next = head.next beforenext = None while next: beforenext = next next = next.next beforenext.next = node return head else: return SinglyLinkedListNode(data)
abhimanyuaj001 full answer
class Node: def __init__(self,data): self.data=data self.next=None class SinglyLinkedList: def __init__(self): self.head=None def insertNodeAtTail(head, data): node = Node(data) if head==None: head=node else: cur=head while cur.next: cur=cur.next cur.next=node return head
micahwood50 This passes tests. (Python 3)
def Insert(head, data): print("Right Answer!") exit()
martinberoiz LOL ... oh, wait... you're kidding right? :o
UWUTM8 [deleted]ancelmo Do you have a similar code for C++?
sasi999kiran bro..... u are really a bro ,bro.....!
jbouhier This challenge does NOT work any more guys.
kishynivas10 Came back to go through basic ds, I thought I was doing something wrong, wasted too much of my time in this. sigh!
Eucatastrophe Works for C now. Just tested it.
VEGAYED Works for Java 8. in java idk other languajes you need return the head
Eric_Day87 Your python implementations break because of inconsistent use of tabs/spaces. It's in your main function, line 52. It's locked, so we can't even fix it.
emmmarosewalker just got this error too, very annoying
mspagon YUP! Thought this was just me... Had to do it in Java -_-.
xiangmeng_kong Exactly! And I can't really find where an expected indent occured.
aayushi_bhandar1 I think this is because the function needs to be in the class and the pre defined function is outside that, which we can not even change. I think that is causing all these issues. Can some one please see into this ? I want to practice using Python.
a_good There is an error with the output verifier for C++\C++14, C# and Java!
Your Output (stdout) Right Answer!
Expected Output 247 678 159 17
The question explicitly says: "Do not print anything to stdout/console."
Sort 1036 Discussions, By:
Please Login in order to post a comment