We use cookies to ensure you have the best browsing experience on our website. Please read our cookie policy for more information about how we use cookies.
I didn't understand how the jumps are numbered as 2,5,6 and in the sequence illustration 5 is never used even in the diagram. Observe that our thunderheads are the clouds numbered 2,5,6 .
Hence, I feel I didn't understand the question as couldn't corelate the same with the given example.
Cookie support is required to access HackerRank
Seems like cookies are disabled on this browser, please enable them to open this website
Jumping on the Clouds: Revisited
You are viewing a single comment's thread. Return to all comments →
I didn't understand how the jumps are numbered as 2,5,6 and in the sequence illustration 5 is never used even in the diagram. Observe that our thunderheads are the clouds numbered 2,5,6 .
Hence, I feel I didn't understand the question as couldn't corelate the same with the given example.