We use cookies to ensure you have the best browsing experience on our website. Please read our cookie policy for more information about how we use cookies.
- Prepare
- Python
- Numpy
- Concatenate
- Discussions
Concatenate
Concatenate
Sort by
recency
|
460 Discussions
|
Please Login in order to post a comment
My compact solution…
This was a very, very poor problem. The challenge was to take the input, make two arrays with it, then concatenate them into one. However, if the input for the two arrays is instead read into a single array, there's no need to concatenate two arrays.
With that in mind, here's a more facetious solution that doesn't use NumPy, but passes all the tests…
😛
A better problem would've been to read in two arrays, then concatenate them in the opposite order.
import numpy as np
n,m,p = map(int,input().split()) ar1 = np.array([input().split() for i in range(n)], int) ar2 = np.array([input().split() for i in range(m)], int)
print(np.concatenate((ar1,ar2), axis=0))
Here is HackerRank Concatenate in Python solution - https://programmingoneonone.com/hackerrank-concatenate-problem-solution-in-python.html
I get what we're going for here, but I can't help but notice that none of the methods this was probably designed to test are actually necessary. There's no reason to concatenate, or handle the length of each array, nor worry about which axis it will be joined on, because the damn input is already formatted as a 2d array!