We use cookies to ensure you have the best browsing experience on our website. Please read our cookie policy for more information about how we use cookies.
  1. Counting Sort 1
  2. Discussions

Counting Sort 1

  • packet_racket
     + 9 comments

    Is anyone else seeing an error in sample test case 1? It expects a '0' as the last element of the result. This implies that the test case expects the algorithm to count one additional element beyond the largest element in the list.

    input: 63 54 17 78 43 70 32 97 16 94 74 18 60 61 35 83 13 56 75 52 70 12 24 37 17 0 16 64 34 81 82 24 69 2 30 61 83 37 97 16 70 53 0 61 12 17 97 67 33 30 49 70 11 40 67 94 84 60 35 58 19 81 16 14 68 46 42 81 75 87 13 84 33 34 14 96 7 59 17 98 79 47 71 75 8 27 73 66 64 12 29 35 80 78 80 6 5 24 49 82

    my result: 2 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 3 2 2 0 4 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 2 3 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 2 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1 1 4 1 0 1 1 3 0 0 2 1 2 3 2 2 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 3 1

    expected result: 2 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 3 2 2 0 4 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 2 3 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 2 3 0 1 2 0 1 2 1 1 4 1 0 1 1 3 0 0 2 1 2 3 2 2 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 3 1 0