We use cookies to ensure you have the best browsing experience on our website. Please read our cookie policy for more information about how we use cookies.
How can you assume that the root is 1 and another child is 2? And why are you swapping 1 twice? And what's the meaning of the -1 -1, -1 -1. Makes no sense to me.
I think all the information you need is in the problem description. It's just a lot to take in.
The tree with N nodes is rooted at the node with index 1 as described in the Swapping operation section. So the root of the tree is 1.
-1 is used to represent a null node, as described in the Input Format section. For example, the -1s in the second of the N lines mean that the node with index 2 has NULL pointers for both of its children. Similarly, the -1s in the third of the N lines means that the node with index 3 also has NULL pointers for both of its children.
I don't think there's a particular reason why we swap at level 1 twice. The sample inputs are just used to illustrate an example (Sample Input/Output #00 correspond to Test Case #00 in the Explanation section).
Index 1 and the value of the root are not the same. Binary tree root can contain any value. That part of the problem declaration is ambiguous. For example:
5/ \
32/\/ \
106917
Is still a binary tree. It's not sorted, but that does not disqualify it as a binary tree.
Swap Nodes [Algo]
You are viewing a single comment's thread. Return to all comments →
Input is somehow ambiguous, for example
3
2 3
-1 -1
-1 -1
2
1
1
How can you assume that the root is 1 and another child is 2? And why are you swapping 1 twice? And what's the meaning of the -1 -1, -1 -1. Makes no sense to me.
I think all the information you need is in the problem description. It's just a lot to take in.
The tree with N nodes is rooted at the node with index 1 as described in the Swapping operation section. So the root of the tree is 1.
-1 is used to represent a null node, as described in the Input Format section. For example, the -1s in the second of the N lines mean that the node with index 2 has NULL pointers for both of its children. Similarly, the -1s in the third of the N lines means that the node with index 3 also has NULL pointers for both of its children.
I don't think there's a particular reason why we swap at level 1 twice. The sample inputs are just used to illustrate an example (Sample Input/Output #00 correspond to Test Case #00 in the Explanation section).
Index 1 and the value of the root are not the same. Binary tree root can contain any value. That part of the problem declaration is ambiguous. For example:
Is still a binary tree. It's not sorted, but that does not disqualify it as a binary tree.