We use cookies to ensure you have the best browsing experience on our website. Please read our cookie policy for more information about how we use cookies.
If you don't want to use std::vector here, you can use std::array instead, not C-style arrays.
And no, std::vector is not 'much more heavier'. It depends on how you use it (i.e. if you do a lot of reallocations). In my code, there is only one allocation since I provide the size at the initialization.
Arrays Introduction
You are viewing a single comment's thread. Return to all comments →
Dunno why those but in fact vector is much more heavier than plain array. So there is a good point in using it instead vector. Imho.
If you don't want to use std::vector here, you can use std::array instead, not C-style arrays.
And no, std::vector is not 'much more heavier'. It depends on how you use it (i.e. if you do a lot of reallocations). In my code, there is only one allocation since I provide the size at the initialization.
Why did you use "auto"? What's it means?
I thought it was used to declare local variables, is it another use?
std::array can not be used here because the size of an std::array must be provided at compile time.