You are viewing a single comment's thread. Return to all comments →
i dont get it, we could linearly perform search for 3 types and get count instead of 3 counters or 3 for loops. am i missing something here?
Seems like cookies are disabled on this browser, please enable them to open this website
Plus Minus
You are viewing a single comment's thread. Return to all comments →
i dont get it, we could linearly perform search for 3 types and get count instead of 3 counters or 3 for loops. am i missing something here?